Ohio Supreme Court, 1960

Ex parte Maltos

Ex parte Maltos
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 13, 1960 · Bell, Eygandt, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taft, Zlmmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 217

Ex parte Maltos

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities or errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

W EYGANDT, C. J., ZlMMERMAN, TaFT, MATTHIAS, BeLL, Herbert and Peck, J J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.