Ohio Supreme Court, 1960

Ex parte Buckhanan

Ex parte Buckhanan
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1960 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 360

Ex parte Buckhanan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged error of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

"Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.