Ohio Supreme Court, 1960

Ex parte Rone

Ex parte Rone
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 28, 1960 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402

Ex parte Rone

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offense with which he was charged and of which he was found guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.