Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Cruikshank v. Sacks

Cruikshank v. Sacks
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 1, 1961 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 552

Cruikshank v. Sacks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by wav\ of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to re*553view the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.