Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Gamble v. Sacks

Gamble v. Sacks
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1961 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Tapt, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 60

Gamble v. Sacks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he complains and which he claims deprived him of his constitutional rights and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Tapt, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.