Gamble v. Sacks
Gamble v. Sacks
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 60
Gamble v. Sacks
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he complains and which he claims deprived him of his constitutional rights and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.