Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Grahl v. Matthews

Grahl v. Matthews
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 19, 1961 · Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135

Grahl v. Matthews

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant did not permit judgment to be taken against her or refuse to plead further. The sustaining of the motion to strike a part of the amended answer, considering such motion as a demurrer, leaves the cause still pending in the trial court. The order of the trial court, considering the motion to strike the second defense from the amended answer as a demurrer and sustaining it, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St., 199.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.