Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Treat v. Sacks

Treat v. Sacks
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 10, 1961 · Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246

Treat v. Sacks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is no showing or claim that petitioner made application to be discharged or brought to trial between the time of his indictment and trial. To entitle an accused to a discharge on the ground that he was not brought to trial during the time limited by statute, he must make application to the court therefor. State v. Cunningham, 171 Ohio St., 54.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑