Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Riley v. Eckle

Riley v. Eckle
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 10, 1961 · Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 248

Riley v. Eckle

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the, alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, O. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.