Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Sharp v. Eckle

Sharp v. Eckle
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 24, 1961 · Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 279

Sharp v. Eckle

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.