Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Johnson v. Eckle

Johnson v. Eckle
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 31, 1961 · Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 291

Johnson v. Eckle

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A parole violator is not entitled to credit for the period of his declared violations. Consequently, petitioner has not served the maximum sentence imposed and, therefore, is not entitled to his release by habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑