Austin v. Sacks
Austin v. Sacks
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 292
Austin v. Sacks
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged errors and irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner rema/nded to custody.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.