Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1961

Baker v. Sacks

Baker v. Sacks
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 14, 1961 · Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Weygandt, Zimmerman
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 340

Baker v. Sacks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St., 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑