Ohio Supreme Court, 1962

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 21, 1962 · Griffith, Herbert, Kerns, Matthias, Neill, Place, Second, Stead, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 21

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court, from a careful examination of the record and a consideration of the course of conduct of the respondent, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its findings or recommendation. Therefore, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Kerns, O’Neill and Griffith, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Dissenting Opinion

Taft, J.,

dissenting. I dissent for the reason that in my opinion the course of conduct of the respondent as disclosed by the transcript of proceedings before the board of commissioners justifies an indefinite suspension of respondent from the practice of law. ■_

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.