Ohio Supreme Court, 1963

State ex rel. Nadlin v. Somers

State ex rel. Nadlin v. Somers
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 13, 1963 · Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 273

State ex rel. Nadlin v. Somers

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The petition does not set forth facts indicating that respondents are required to perform any specific duty imposed upon them by law and therefore does not state a cause of action in mandamus. Relator’s motion is overruled, respondents’ motion to dismiss is sustained, and judgment denying the writ is rendered accordingly.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.