Ohio Supreme Court, 1963

Massengale v. George

Massengale v. George
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 29, 1963 · Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taet, Zimmerman
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558

Massengale v. George

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not be granted unless the relator establishes a clear legal right thereto. There is no bill of exceptions to show what, if any, evidence the relator presented to the Court of Appeals to establish his right to a writ.

The relator not having established a clear legal right to the relief sought, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.