Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1963

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 12, 1963 · Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

Opinion of the Court

. The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved. See Sperry v. State of Florida, ex rel. The Florida Bar, 373 U. S., 379.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑