Ohio Supreme Court, 1964

State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes

State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 13, 1964 · Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231

State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions to show what was before the Court of Appeals when it granted the motion for summary judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Smith v. Diamond Milk Products, Inc., 176 Ohio St., 143.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.