State ex rel. Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court June 17, 1964

State ex rel. Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 349 (Ohio 1964)

Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Industrial Commission, a fact-finding administrative agency, has made factual determinations in *350these causes. This court cannot say, from an examination of the records, that the commission abused its discretion in making such findings. A clear legal right to writs of mandamus has not been established.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State, ex rel. The Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, (Two cases.)
Status: Published