Ohio Supreme Court, 1964

State ex rel. Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 17, 1964 · Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 349

State ex rel. Hall China Co. v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Industrial Commission, a fact-finding administrative agency, has made factual determinations in *350these causes. This court cannot say, from an examination of the records, that the commission abused its discretion in making such findings. A clear legal right to writs of mandamus has not been established.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.