Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners

Ohio Supreme Court November 25, 1964

Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners, 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63 (Ohio 1964)

Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in charging on contributory negligence. Under the facts of this case, contributory negligence was a question of fact for determination by the jury.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Grass v. Ake, Exr., 154 Ohio St., 84. See, also, Horwitz v. Eurove, 129 Ohio St., 8.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., dissents.

Reference

Status: Published