Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners
Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners
177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63
Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners
Opinion of the Court
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in charging on contributory negligence. Under the facts of this case, contributory negligence was a question of fact for determination by the jury.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Grass v. Ake, Exr., 154 Ohio St., 84. See, also, Horwitz v. Eurove, 129 Ohio St., 8.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.