Ohio Supreme Court, 1965

Jordan v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 20, 1965 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taut, Zimmerman

1 Ohio St. 2d 76; 204 N.E.2d 61; 30 Ohio Op. 2d 144; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 559

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re H.V. (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State ex rel. Young v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority (Ohio 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner in the instant case does not attack the validity of either of his convictions. His sole contention is that he should be serving both sentences concurrently.

Where one on parole is convicted of another offense, the sentences on the different convictions run consecutively unless the sentence for the latter offense specifically provides that it shall run concurrently with the sentence for the prior offense. King v. Maxwell, Warden, 173 Ohio St. 536; Stewart v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St. 180.

Inasmuch as neither of petitioner’s sentences has expired, he is presently properly imprisoned, and relief by habeas corpus does not lie.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taut, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.