Ohio Supreme Court, 1965

Ball v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 20, 1965 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman

1 Ohio St. 2d 77; 204 N.E.2d 62; 30 Ohio Op. 2d 145; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 560

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Armstrong v. Wilson (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
Matter of Complaint of Totten v. Collins, 08ap-257 (8-19-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Shomer v. Brunsman, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
Shomer v. Brunsman, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
Ali v. State, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
Ball v. Tate, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
Petrowski v. State, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
Bugert v. Haskins, Unpublished Decision (12-20-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Thomas (Ohio 1980)
Flowers v. Haskins (Ohio 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In this action, petitioner is attacking only the validity of his 1961 convictions. Inasmuch as petitioner is still subject to detention under his 1960 convictions habeas corpus does not lie. To entitle one to relief by habeas corpus a determination of the action in petitioner’s favor must effectuate a release from present confinement. Page v. Green, Supt., 174 Ohio St. 178; Neal v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 206; and Lowther v. Maxwell, Warden, 175 Ohio St. 39.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.