Ohio Supreme Court, 1965

Lamonge v. Maxwell

Lamonge v. Maxwell
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 21, 1965 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmermah
2 Ohio St. 2d 111; 206 N.E.2d 562; 31 Ohio Op. 2d 152; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 498

Lamonge v. Maxwell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As grounds for his release petitioner urges that the amendment to the indictment voided the indictment, that the grand jury was improperly selected, and that errors were committed in relation to the admission of evidence and in the cross-examination of petitioner.

The issues raised by petitioner are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must be raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 136.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, O. J., Zimmermah, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.