Lamonge v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court
Lamonge v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St. 2d 111 (Ohio 1965)
206 N.E.2d 562; 31 Ohio Op. 2d 152; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 498
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmermah

Lamonge v. Maxwell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As grounds for his release petitioner urges that the amendment to the indictment voided the indictment, that the grand jury was improperly selected, and that errors were committed in relation to the admission of evidence and in the cross-examination of petitioner.

The issues raised by petitioner are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must be raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 136.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, O. J., Zimmermah, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lamonge v. Maxwell, Warden
Status
Published