Ohio Supreme Court, 1965

State ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 28, 1965 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
2 Ohio St. 2d 120; 206 N.E.2d 911; 31 Ohio Op. 2d 192; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 500
State ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial Commission

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Industrial Commission has control over its orders until the actual institution of an appeal therefrom or until the expiration of the time for such an appeal. See Diltz v. Crouch, Dir. of Liquor Control, 173 Ohio St. 367.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.