Turpin v. Maxwell
Turpin v. Maxwell
2 Ohio St. 2d 234; 208 N.E.2d 134; 31 Ohio Op. 2d 459; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 536
Turpin v. Maxwell
Opinion of the Court
In this action, petitioner is attacking the validity of his indictment, the mittimus taking him to the penitentiary, the execution of the warrant to convey and, generally, the jurisdiction of the trial court.
These issues are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must be raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 136.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.