In this action, petitioner contends that he has been denied due process and equal protection of the laws by the refusal of the trial court to grant his request for a trial transcript so that he could perfect his appeal. However, *338no appeal was prosecuted from this alleged denial of a bill of exceptions.

The question, as to whether an accused has been- denied a transcript of testimony and by such denial deprived of his constitutional rights, is a question which must be raised by appeal from the order denying such transcript and is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Tinsley v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 185; McCoy v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 249; and Vaughn v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 289.

Petitioner remanded to custody.