Ohio Supreme Court, 1965

State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon

State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 30, 1965 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
3 Ohio St. 2d 52; 209 N.E.2d 171; 32 Ohio Op. 2d 28; 1965 Ohio LEXIS 444
State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

If, as relator contends, respondent has property belonging to relator, relator may recover such property in an action of replevin. In the exercise of its discretion, this court will ordinarily refuse a writ of mandamus where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.