State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust

Ohio Supreme Court March 1, 1965

State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust, 30 Ohio Law Rep. 61 (Ohio 1965)

Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman

Opinion of the Court

Schneider, Judge.

Sections 2506.01 to 2506.04, inclusive, Revised Code, afford an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from a final order, adjudication or decision of an administrative board, so that the writ of prohibition will not issue at the instance of a party who alleges irregularities in the proceedings of such a board and an*62ticipates that such a board will deprive him of procedural and substantive rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: State, ex rel., DeWeaver v. Faust, Board of Examiners of Plumbers of City of Dayton
Status: Published