State v. Loudermill

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Loudermill, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 9 (Ohio 1965)
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman

State v. Loudermill

Opinion of the Court

Schneider, Judge.

Where the evidence in a criminal case would support a finding by the jury of guilt of a lesser offense included in the offense for which defendant was indicted and tried, the refusal of the trial court to charge upon that lesser included offense is error prejudicial to the rights of defendant. (Paragraph two of the syllabus of State v. Patterson, 172 OhioSt. 319, 16 O.O.(2d) 116, overruled; Freeman v. State, 119 OhioSt. 250, and State v. Muskus, 158 OhioSt. 276, 49 O.O. 122, approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Ohio v. Loudermill
Status
Published