Ohio Supreme Court, 1966

State ex rel. Turrin v. County Court

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 2, 1966 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman

5 Ohio St. 2d 194; 34 Ohio Op. 2d 350; 214 N.E.2d 670; 1966 Ohio LEXIS 409

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Martin v. Mannen (Ohio 2007)
State v. Echols (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. Larbi, Unpublished Decision (6-21-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
In re Davis (Ohio 1999)
State v. Fiorenzo (Ohio Ct. App. 1996)
State v. Harris (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Doughman (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Deckard, Unpublished Decision (6-19-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State v. Ake (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
City of Xenia v. Manker (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
State v. Sherman, Unpublished Decision (6-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. Trott, Unpublished Decision (3-22-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Ferguson, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Ake, Unpublished Decision (9-22-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Hatcher (Montgomery County Court 1982)
State v. Pachay (Ohio 1980)
Village of Sheffield v. Nieves (Ohio Ct. App. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The dividing by the county commissioners of the area of one township into two townships did not effect a change in the territorial jurisdiction of the County Court. The County Court, Central Area, retains jurisdiction over the area *196previously designated by the Common Pleas Court, including the area of the new township created totally within the area so previously designated.

In regard to the contention in the Rassin case that Section 2938.11 (F), Revised Code, was not complied with, the petition alleges that the case was submitted on December 14, 1964, at 11 a. m., and the judgment was announced on December 16, 1964, at 2 p. m. The statutory provision is directory and was sufficiently complied with. See City of Columbus v. Nappi, 5 Ohio St. 2d 99.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.