Ohio Supreme Court, 1966

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Rekeweg

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 27, 1966 · Are, Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Sufficient, Suspension, Taft, Would, Zimmerman

6 Ohio St. 2d 128; 216 N.E.2d 370; 35 Ohio Op. 2d 150; 1966 Ohio LEXIS 353

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle (Ohio 1981)
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Hughes (Ohio 1976)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Tuttle (Ohio 1975)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The findings of the board are supported by the evidence and its recommendation is warranted. Therefore, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered permanently disbarring respondent from the practice of law.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., ZimmermaN, Matthias, O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert and Schneider, JJ., are of the opinion that suspension for an indefinite period would he sufficient.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.