Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court March 27, 1968

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission, 14 Ohio St. 2d 24 (Ohio 1968)

235 N.E.2d 238; 43 Ohio Op. 2d 13; 1968 Ohio LEXIS 411

Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zxmmebman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.

Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145, 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237, 47 N. E. 2d 780.

Therefore, the order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Bruder, d. b. a. Bruder Cartage Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published