Ohio Supreme Court, 1968

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 27, 1968 · No. 41138 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zxmmebman

14 Ohio St. 2d 24; 235 N.E.2d 238; 43 Ohio Op. 2d 13; 1968 Ohio LEXIS 411

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bertolini v. Public Utilities Commission (Ohio 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.

Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145, 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237, 47 N. E. 2d 780.

Therefore, the order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.