State ex rel. Bargahiser v. Board of Elections
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Miller v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 2002)
- State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 2002)
- State Ex Rel. Klein v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
- State ex rel. White v. Franklin County Board of Elections (Ohio 1992)
- State v. Cuyahoga Cty Bd Elec., Unpublished Decision (11-02-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin County Board of Elections (Ohio 1989)
- Brink v. Franklin County Board of Elections (Ohio Ct. App. 1985)
- Jones v. Gill (Haw. 1968)
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 2002)
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 2002)
- State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1992)
- State ex rel. Evans v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1992)
- State ex rel. Doughty v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1991)
- State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1986)
- State ex rel. Burnett v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1983)
- State ex rel. Roope v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1982)
- Foster v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections (Ohio Ct. App. 1977)
- State ex rel. Fisher v. Brown (Ohio 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
These are actions in mandamus originating in this court. Belators seek to compel the respondent board of elections to place their names on the ballot as candidates for the office of member of the Bepublican County Central Committee at an election to be held on May 7, 1968. The respondent board of elections found certain part-petitions of the relators to be invalid and refused to certify relators’ names as candidates for office and refused to order their names printed on the ballot.
Bespondents filed demurrers to the petitions in mandamus on the ground of laches. The demurrers are well taken. No later than February 17, 1968 (the final date for protests), both relators knew of respondents’ refusal to certify their candidacies. On February 22,1968, the official forms of the ballot were certified by the board of elections. Instead of promptly seeking the judicial relief to which they claim to be entitled, relators delayed until April 15, 1968, before bringing any action in any court, at which time relators brought the instant actions in this court.
Writs denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.