Pace v. Village of Walton Hills
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Euclid v. Mabel (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
- Township of Kidder v. Steinbronn (Carbon County Court of Common Pleas 1981)
- Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City, Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City (9th Cir. 1976)
- Mari Bras v. Warden of the Municipal Jail of San Juan (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1972)
- Mari Bras v. Alcaide Cárcel Municipal de San Juan (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1972)
- People v. Lou Bern Broadway, Inc. (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The absolute prohibition of the use of political signs is unconstitutional. Peltz v. South Euclid, 11 Ohio St. 2d 128. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and judgment is entered for appellant that ordinance No. 1951-3 of the village of Walton Hills, to the extent that it prohibits the use of political signs in residential districts, violates Section 11, Article I of the Constitution of Ohio, and the First and. Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, and appellees are permanently enjoined from enforcing the ordinance to the extent of its constitutional infirmity as herein indicated.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.