Ohio Supreme Court, 1968

Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 4, 1968 · Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman

16 Ohio St. 2d 42; 242 N.E.2d 571; 45 Ohio Op. 2d 325; 1968 Ohio LEXIS 336

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Canton Towers, Ltd. v. Board of Revision (Ohio 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellant contends that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful *43because the board failed to consider all the evidence in determining the true value in money of the subject-property and because the board rejected all the testimony of the appellant’s expert witness.

A complete and careful examination of the entire record in this cause discloses that the finding of the Board of Tax Appeals is supported by creditable and substantial evidence and that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is not unreasonable or unlawful.

The decision of the board is, therefore, affirmed on authority of Bd. of Revision v. Fodor, 15 Ohio St. 2d 52.

Decision affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.