King v. Salisbury
King v. Salisbury
18 Ohio St. 2d 118; 247 N.E.2d 749; 47 Ohio Op. 2d 279; 1969 Ohio LEXIS 382
King v. Salisbury
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner contends that his 1951 sentence, which has now expired, was invalid on the grounds that the record does not show he was informed of his constitutional right to counsel.
Petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction by a court of record of competent jurisdiction. He does not attack his 1941 conviction, and his sentence under the 1951 conviction which he contends is invalid has expired.
Writ demed and petitioner remanded to custody.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.