State ex rel. Bowling v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Bowling v. Court of Common Pleas, 24 Ohio St. 2d 158 (Ohio 1970)
265 N.E.2d 296; 53 Ohio Op. 2d 355; 1970 Ohio LEXIS 357
Corrigan, Duncan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern
State ex rel. Bowling v. Court of Common Pleas
Opinion of the Court
This is an action in mandamus originating in this court. Relator, a prisoner, seeks to compel the state to dismiss an indictment pending against him on the ground that the case was not tried within 180 days after his demand for trial under R. C. 2941.401, effective November 8, 1969.
The relator has a clear and adequate remedy at law. He has been indicted and is represented by counsel. He can make a motion in the trial court for dismissal of the charge for denial of a speedy trial, under R. C. 2941.401, or on any other grounds he desires.
Mandamus does not lie where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.
The motion to dismiss is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State, ex rel. Bowling v. Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County
- Cited By
- 15 cases
- Status
- Published