Ohio Supreme Court, 1971

State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine

State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 1971 · Corrigan, Duncan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Steen
25 Ohio St. 2d 184; 267 N.E.2d 594; 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296; 1971 Ohio LEXIS 549
State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Mandamus lies only to compel the performance of an act which is clearly enjoined by law upon a respondent. Here, the respondent did not have possession of the property which relator sought to have returned to him by this action in mandamus.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., SchneideR, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Steen and Leach, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.