State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
25 Ohio St. 2d 184; 267 N.E.2d 594; 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296; 1971 Ohio LEXIS 549
State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
Opinion of the Court
Mandamus lies only to compel the performance of an act which is clearly enjoined by law upon a respondent. Here, the respondent did not have possession of the property which relator sought to have returned to him by this action in mandamus.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.