Ohio Supreme Court, 1971

State v. Edsall

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 19, 1971 · Corrigan, Duncan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern

26 Ohio St. 2d 145; 269 N.E.2d 848; 55 Ohio Op. 2d 276; 1971 Ohio LEXIS 503

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Borden v. Hendon (Ohio 2002)
State ex rel. Borden v. Hendon (Ohio 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus tests only the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. In this ease, the J\ivenile *146Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of appellant. Accordingly, its original order of commitment, as well as its subsequent order of July 9, 1970, committing appellant to the detention home for 30 days, were valid and lawful orders by a court of competent jurisdiction. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.