State ex rel. Ratliff v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Ratliff v. Marshall, 30 Ohio St. 2d 101 (Ohio 1972)
282 N.E.2d 582; 59 Ohio Op. 2d 114; 1972 Ohio LEXIS 462
Brown, Corrigan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern

State ex rel. Ratliff v. Marshall

Opinion of the Court

Per G-uriam.

Procedendo is a high prerogative writ of an extraordinary nature. It is an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment and does not lie to control or interfere with ordinary court procedure. Procedendo does not lie where, as here, there is no clear legal right to such relief.

Moreover, even if relators’ complaint is considered to be in mandamus, that remedy is not available where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Here, relators have an adequate remedy by appeal.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ sought is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, ex rel. Ratliff v. Marshall, Judge
Cited By
17 cases
Status
Published