Ross v. Common Pleas Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Ross v. Common Pleas Court, 30 Ohio St. 2d 323 (Ohio 1972)
285 N.E.2d 25; 59 Ohio Op. 2d 385; 1972 Ohio LEXIS 430
Brown, Corrigan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern
Ross v. Common Pleas Court
Opinion of the Court
Habeas corpus is not available where it appears that the sentencing court had jurisdiction to render the judgment of conviction. Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4. In this case, petitioner makes no claim of lack of jurisdiction by the respondent court.
Moreover, petitioner does not allege that his guilty plea, entered while he was represented by counsel, was not voluntary. “A defendant who enters a voluntary plea of
The motion to dismiss the complaint is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ross v. Common Pleas Court of Auglaize County
- Cited By
- 77 cases
- Status
- Published