Ohio Supreme Court, 1973

State v. Clay

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 20, 1973 · Beown, Celebeezze, Cobeigan, Heebeet, Neill, Steen

34 Ohio St. 2d 250; 298 N.E.2d 137; 63 Ohio Op. 2d 391; 1973 Ohio LEXIS 377

Cases that cite this one

162 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

State v. King (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Morgan, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Russell, Unpublished Decision (4-2-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Davis (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
State v. Andrews (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
State v. Embry (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
State v. Christian (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Dolphin (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Vineyard (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Boling (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Caulfield (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Griffin (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Rednour (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Johnson (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Leibold (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Taylor (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Young (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Johnson (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
State v. Cosby (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
State v. Walker-Stokes (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
State v. Porter (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Strongsville v. Troutman, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Yslas (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Broughton, Unpublished Decision (9-27-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Jackson, 88222 (4-5-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An examination of the record fails to disclose misconduct on the part of the prosecutor. Certainly there was no affirmative showing by appellant that he was entitled to a new trial. The jury resolved the facts of the case and determined the credibility of the witnesses before it, which was its responsibility. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of that court (29 Ohio App. 2d 206)..

Judgment affirmed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., Heebeet, Cobeigan, Steen, Celebeezze, W. Beown and P. Beown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.