Wycuff v. Fotomat Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Wycuff v. Fotomat Corp., 38 Ohio St. 2d 196 (Ohio 1974)
311 N.E.2d 657; 67 Ohio Op. 2d 205; 1974 Ohio LEXIS 442
Brown, Celebrezjze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Steew
Wycuff v. Fotomat Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Appellants’ sole contention is that the time prescribed in R. C. 4141.28 for appealing the decision of the administrator on reconsideration is “determined from the date such decision is mailed,” and that appellee’s
The burden of showing when the rehearing decision of the administrator was mailed was on the public agency. Here, no proof was established to show when that decision was actually deposited in the mail.
This court reaffirms its position in King v. Garnes (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 187, and, on authority of that case, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published