Ohio Supreme Court, 1976

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 26, 1976 · Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neiml, Stern
46 Ohio St. 2d 271; 347 N.E.2d 526; 75 Ohio Op. 2d 322; 1976 Ohio LEXIS 630
State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that “respondent grossly abused its discretion by awarding a percentage of disability in reliance upon medical reports of conditions (a) other than those for which the claim was allowed, (b) not supported by objective evidence of (c) new and changed conditions. ’ ’

However, a review of the record discloses that there is evidence which supports the findings of the Industrial Commission, and, accordingly, this court will not disturb that determination. See State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.