Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Motley v. Motley (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
- Hayes v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1993)
- Bauer v. Bauer (Ohio Ct. App. 1989)
- Zweifel v. Price (Ohio Ct. App. 1985)
- Maphet v. Heiselman (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
- Bugay v. Bugay (Ohio Ct. App. 1977)
- Quillen v. Deaton, Unpublished Decision (2-2-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
- Nuckols v. Nuckols (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I dissent from the judgments herein for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Nokes v. Nokes (1976), 47 Ohio. St. 2d 1, 9, decided this day.
Opinion of the Court
The sole factor and consideration which distinguishes these cases from the analysis in Nokes v. Nokes (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d 1, .decided this day, -is that such support order was formulated by incorporating parental separation agreements -into .the divorce decree. :■
Inasmuch as under Ohio law, a separation agreement of the parties-loses its nature, as a .contract the'moment it is adopted by the court and incorporated into a decree of divorce, we find that such distinguishing factor is of insufficient force to prevent the application hereto of the principles enunciated in N olees.
Therefore,-in light-of Nglees, the judgment in case No. 75-197 is affirmed and'the judgments in cases Nos. 75-144 and 75-482 are reversed.
Judgment affirmed in case No. 75-197-.
Judgments reversed in cases Nos. 75-144 and 75-482.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.