State ex rel. Dormody v. McClure

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Dormody v. McClure, 50 Ohio St. 2d 335 (Ohio 1977)
364 N.E.2d 278; 4 Ohio Op. 3d 476; 1977 Ohio LEXIS 423
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Looher, Neill, Sweeney

State ex rel. Dormody v. McClure

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Relators seek writs of prohibition to prevent respondent from trying them for the offenses of driving while under the influence of alcohol (R. C. 4511.19), alleging that respondent has no jurisdiction due to the fact that the Uniform Traffic Ticket sanctioned by Traf. R. 21 does not provide that the signature of the issuing officer be verified.

Prohibition is not the proper remedy where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Dickison, v. Court of Common Pleas (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 179. Respondent has jurisdiction of the persons and subject matter. Any complaint with regard to the form of the ticket can be dealt with by motion prior to trial or in the ordinary course of appeal.

Since the relators have an adequate remedy at law, the writs are denied.

Writs denied.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, P. Brown, Sweeney and Looher, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, ex rel. Dormody v. McClure, Judge The State, ex rel. Dudas v. McClure, Judge The State, ex rel. Hajek v. McClure, Judge The State, ex rel. Stroud v. McClure, Judge The State, ex rel. Veal v. McClure, Judge
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published