State ex rel. Wargo v. Price
State ex rel. Wargo v. Price
56 Ohio St. 2d 65; 381 N.E.2d 943; 10 Ohio Op. 3d 116; 1978 Ohio LEXIS 652
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- Delmonte v. Concerned Citizens Good Gov., Unpublished Decision (1-18-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- Han v. Univ. of Dayton (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- Schaeffer v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (9-13-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- Kindred v. Kindred, Unpublished Decision (7-1-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- State v. Russell, Unpublished Decision (4-8-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- Fasano v. Fasano, Unpublished Decision (5-6-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- Aristocrat Lakewood Nursing Home v. Mayne (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- Wille v. Hunkar Laboratories, Inc. (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
- Lalak v. Crestmont Construction Inc., Unpublished Decision (1-14-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
- Barbeck v. Twinsburg Township (Ohio Ct. App. 1992)
- Stibora v. Greater Cleveland Bowling Assn. (Ohio Ct. App. 1989)
- Derrico v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Kerr v. Kelsey (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- West v. Devendra (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- Harris v. School Dist., Unpublished Decision (5-5-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (Ohio 1991)
- Solowitch v. Bennett (Ohio Ct. App. 1982)
- State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. Calandra (Ohio 1980)
- State ex rel. Riverside Methodist Hospital v. Gillie (Ohio 1979)
- Johns 3301 Toledo Cafe, Inc. v. Liquor Control Comm., 07ap-632 (2-5-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- Coles v. Daniels, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Regency Centre Dev. v. Constr. Dimensions, Unpublished Decision (9-25-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- King v. Cashland, Inc., Unpublished Decision (9-1-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- McCray v. City of Springboro, Unpublished Decision (7-13-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Amendment of pleadings by leave of the-court, Civ. E. 15(A), is a matter of judicial discretion, subject to review on appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Marshall, v. Keller (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 203, 205.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.