Ohio Supreme Court, 1979

State v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 21, 1979 · Brown, Celebrezze, First, Herbert, Holmes, Keefe, Locher, Potter, Sixth, Sweeney

57 Ohio St. 2d 71; 387 N.E.2d 229; 11 Ohio Op. 3d 242; 1979 Ohio LEXIS 368

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal Court (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1980)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of and for the reasons stated in State v. Burgum, (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 354, wherein this court held, in- paragraph one of the syllabus, that “R. C. 2907.-01(F), which .'sets forth the definition of ‘obscenity/ is neither unconstitutionally overbroád nor void for vagueness when it is authoritatively construed to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15.”

Judgment reversed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, Keefe, P. Brown, Sweeney, Potter and Holmes, JJ., concur. Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.