Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1979

State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 21, 1979 · Brown, Celebrezze, First, Herbert, Holmes, Keefe, Locher, Potter, Sixth, Sweeney
57 Ohio St. 2d 71; 387 N.E.2d 229; 11 Ohio Op. 3d 242; 1979 Ohio LEXIS 368

State v. Thomas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of and for the reasons stated in State v. Burgum, (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 354, wherein this court held, in- paragraph one of the syllabus, that “R. C. 2907.-01(F), which .'sets forth the definition of ‘obscenity/ is neither unconstitutionally overbroád nor void for vagueness when it is authoritatively construed to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15.”

Judgment reversed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, Keefe, P. Brown, Sweeney, Potter and Holmes, JJ., concur. Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑