Ohio Supreme Court, 1980

State ex rel. Freeman v. Kraft

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 27, 1980 · Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

61 Ohio St. 2d 284; 400 N.E.2d 1357; 15 Ohio Op. 3d 287; 1980 Ohio LEXIS 654

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Coshocton v. Gilbert (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
Stollar v. TRST, L.L.C. (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
Moore v. Emmanuel Family Training Center, Inc. (Ohio 1985)
Bank One v. Ray, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
City of Columbus v. Flex Tech Prof., Unpublished Decision (11-23-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Martin v. Hatfield, Unpublished Decision (8-26-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Joe Soler Co. v. 5-Star Brokerage, Inc. (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
Koester v. Rule (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
Manning v. Miami County Children's Services Board (Ohio 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause is before the court pursuant to an appeal as of right from the overruling of appellant’s motion for relief from a judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition.

Appellant’s arguments to support his appeal all relate to the merits of his original action, which might have been raised on a direct appeal to this court.

The question to be determined on an appeal from denial of a motion for relief from judgment is whether the court abused the discretionary authority provided to it by Civ. R. 60 to give such relief. Here, appellant presents nothing to establish that his contentions fall within any of the provisions of Civ. R. 60. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.