Ohio Supreme Court, 1980

State ex rel. Kynard v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 11, 1980 · Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

62 Ohio St. 2d 308; 405 N.E.2d 719; 16 Ohio Op. 3d 356; 1980 Ohio LEXIS 746

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Crist, Unpublished Decision (10-20-1997) (Ohio Ct. App. 1997)
State v. Coby (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
State Ex Rel. Mayberry v. Kurfess, Unpublished Decision (5-10-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A writ of prohibition will issue when a court seeks to exercise judicial power not authorized by law. State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Wall, v. Grossman (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 4.

Here, there is no question that the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County is authorized to hear a case charging aggravated murder. Appellant’s contentions are to the sufficiency of the indictment and not to the jurisdiction of the trial court to hear and determine the cause. Alleged irregularities in the proceedings of the grand jury returning an indictment do not deprive the lower court of jurisdiction to proceed thereunder. Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal. Chapman v. Jago (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 51; Silliman v. Court (1933), 126 Ohio St. 338.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the complaint for a writ of prohibition is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.