Ohio Supreme Court, 1983

State ex rel. Ellison v. Dresbach

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 13, 1983 · Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

6 Ohio St. 3d 19; 450 N.E.2d 1174; 6 Ohio B. 16; 1983 Ohio LEXIS 767

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Allison v. Daniels, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (Ohio 1994)
State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (Ohio 1994)
Reichert v. Ingersoll (Ohio 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

App. R. 9(E) provides the procedure for the correction or modification of a trial court record. If there is a material omission or misstatement, then the issue may be resolved by either the trial court, the court of appeals, or by stipulation of the parties.

The materials submitted by appellant to this court do not reflect that he attempted to use the procedure provided in the Rules of Appellate Procedure, nor do they indicate that any specific part of the record allegedly omitted was brought to the attention of the court of appeals so as to afford a basis for legitimate inquiry.

Appellant, having failed to show that he is entitled to the relief requested, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.